2015年7月11日托福作文范文

　　【參考范文】

　　Nowadays, the salary level of teachers has aroused a heated discussion in the society. Many teachers consider that their salary is lower compared with other professions, and they advocate the raise in salary to the level that could be compared with doctors, lawyers or even business leaders. As far as I am concerned, though improving the overall payment level of the teachers has certain benefits, whether to raise the salary should be considered more comprehensively.

　　Admittedly, giving teachers’ a comparable salary to doctors, lawyers or even business leaders might serve as an effective tool to motivate teachers. Being given more money, teachers might feel obliged to teach students well. In this case, they might treat students with more patience and respond to their questions more carefully. Also, Giving teachers enough money would relieve their financial burdens, which could keep teachers more concentrated on teaching and improve the overall academic levels. However, on balance, to raise the salary of teachers for the purpose of improving teaching performance might be ineffective because students’ willingness to learn stays the same. This ineffectiveness would cause the rise a waste of money. In this way, the salary of teachers should be evaluated more flexibly.

　　To begin with, whether to raise the salary depends on the contribution teachers have made to the school. In other words, those who have played positive roles in promoting the school deserve a higher salary. For example, Mr. Owen Smith, a teacher in Mountain Ridge High school in Southern California, always organizes school students some social activities with residents in the community. Sometimes, they would play a football game with parents in the neighborhood; sometimes, they would hold a forum regarding how to deal with generation gaps between parents and adolescents; sometimes, they would even hold lectures for parents on how to help children crack SAT so that students could apply for a better college. Thanks to these social activities held by Mr. Owen Smith, Mountain Ridge’s reputation in town is widespread, and since most parents are familiar with how the school runs, they are more willing to send their children to the school. In this case, the school should pay Mr. Owen Smith higher salaries for attracting more students to school.

　　In addition, whether to raise the salary also depends on the role teachers have played in improving students’ academic performance. That is to say, if a teachers could not bring his students helpful guidance in schoolwork, he should not be high paid. According to a survey conducted on Sina Weibo, after polling some headteachers in Beijing, most of them claim that they suffered from a dilemma that teachers’ salary keeps rising every year while the average score students achieve in College Entrance Exam has not improved comparably. The original purpose for raising the salary is to give teachers more incentives in teaching students, but what turns out to be is that teachers, with more money, spend more time on their private life, instead of work. Teachers would choose to travel out of town, instead of helping students after class, which leads to a relative drop in academic performance for students. Under this circumstance, schools might stop providing teachers with high salaries indiscriminately and offer bonus to those who are able to help students achieve satisfactory results in exams.

　　To sum up, improving the salary of teachers seems to bring benefits to schools, but to make the money a better use, more specific thoughts should be given on how to improve it. If a teacher is able to help the school build reputation or help students improve academic performance, the improving salary is a must. Otherwise, the increasing salary might be counter-productive.

　　【參考譯文】

　　如今,教師的工資水平在社會上引起了激烈的討論。許多教師認為他們的薪水較低與其他職業(yè)相比,和他們提倡提高工資水平,可以與醫(yī)生相比,律師甚至商業(yè)領(lǐng)袖。就我而言,盡管改善教師的總體支付水平有一定的好處,是否提高工資應(yīng)該考慮更全面。

　　誠然,給教師一個可比工資醫(yī)生、律師或商界領(lǐng)袖作為一種有效的工具來激勵教師。得到更多的錢,老師可能會覺得有義務(wù)教學(xué)生。在這種情況下,他們可能會對學(xué)生有更多的耐心和更仔細地回答他們的問題。同時,給予教師足夠的錢會減輕他們的經(jīng)濟負擔(dān),可以讓教師更集中在教學(xué)和提高整體學(xué)術(shù)水平。然而,總的來說,提高教師的工資提高教學(xué)績效的目的可能是無效的,因為學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)意愿保持不變。這種無效率會導(dǎo)致浪費金錢。通過這種方式,教師的薪水應(yīng)該評估更靈活。

　　首先,是否提高工資取決于教師對學(xué)校的貢獻。換句話說,那些扮演積極的角色在促進學(xué)校應(yīng)該得到更高的薪水。例如,歐文·史密斯先生,一個老師在山脊高中在南加州,經(jīng)常組織學(xué)生一些社交活動的居民社區(qū)。有時,他們會與父母在附近玩足球游戲;有時候,他們會舉辦一個論壇關(guān)于如何處理父母和青少年之間的代溝;有時,他們甚至?xí)�為父母舉辦講座關(guān)于如何幫助孩子裂紋坐,這樣學(xué)生可以申請一個更好的大學(xué)。由于這些社會活動所持有的歐文·史密斯先生,山脊的聲譽在城里是普遍的,因為大多數(shù)父母都熟悉學(xué)校如何運行時,他們更愿意送他們的孩子去學(xué)校。在這種情況下,學(xué)校應(yīng)史密斯歐文更高的薪水來吸引更多的學(xué)生去學(xué)校。

　　此外,是否提高工資還取決于教師角色在提高學(xué)生的學(xué)業(yè)成績。也就是說,如果一個老師不能帶他的學(xué)生有益指導(dǎo)作業(yè),他應(yīng)該不高。在新浪微博上進行的一項調(diào)查顯示,在輪詢一些中學(xué)校長在北京,他們中的大多數(shù)人聲稱他們遭受困境,教師工資每年持續(xù)上漲,平均分數(shù)學(xué)生在高考沒有實現(xiàn)相對提高。提高工資的最初目的是教學(xué)生給教師更多的激勵,但原來是老師,有更多的錢,花更多的時間在他們的私人生活,而不是工作。老師會選擇離開城鎮(zhèn),而不是幫助學(xué)生下課后,導(dǎo)致對學(xué)生學(xué)業(yè)成績相對下降。在這種情況下,學(xué)�？赡軙�停止為教師提供高工資不加選擇地和提供獎金給那些能夠幫助學(xué)生在考試中取得令人滿意的成果。

　　總之,改善教師的工資似乎造福學(xué)校,而是使錢更好的使用,更具體的想法應(yīng)該如何改進它。如果一個老師能夠幫助學(xué)校建立聲譽或幫助學(xué)生提高學(xué)習(xí)成績,提高工資是必須的。否則,增加工資可能會適得其反。

【7月11日托福作文】相關(guān)文章：

2016年托福作文高分托福句型05-21

托福詞匯01-22

托福詞匯07-15

托福的詞匯01-12

托福與新托福是否一樣04-11

托福詞匯表：有關(guān)農(nóng)業(yè)的托福詞匯03-05

2015托福報考指南：托福口語怎么練06-14

托福詞匯分類記憶：有關(guān)考古的托福詞匯08-13

快速高效背托福單詞-托福詞匯方法07-28

托福作文寫作材料運用05-03